Internet vs. Telephone company
Brian Tackett
cym at acrux.net
Mon Feb 3 21:36:57 UTC 1997
On Mon, 3 Feb 1997, Tim Brown wrote:
> They're also looking at deploying it in parts of Missouri. IMHO, the cost
> is perfect (at least in MO), but I'm leery of the telcos having that much
> control over the network. Also, I hear L2TP is better than L2F, but
And the telcos have no control of the network now? Let's see....if
Ameritech is doing repair on voice equipment, and some ham-handed tech who
just started yesterday destroys one (or more) of our DS-1's....no more
connectivity to that customer, or possibly (if he hits enough of them) to
anyone. I agree that it would really be nice to have 100% control over
things, since unless you do you can't really and truly PROMISE any kind of
reliability.
P.S: I'm not implying that Ameritech (or any other telco) is
incompetent....only that there *IS* an unavoidable danger of service
disruption by accident.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list