Alpha test of MAE filtering capability

Kent W. England kwe at 6SigmaNets.com
Mon Feb 3 19:21:01 UTC 1997


At 08:14 PM 30-01-97 -0600, Sean Donelan wrote:
>>But any reasonable ISP realizes that by using the RADB servers is wonderful,
>>but does not come close to preventing an:
>>ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 <innocent ISP>
>
>Nor can the route servers tell when someone/something blocks packets
>down at the layer 2 level.  Since the route servers are now being paid
>by the exchange point operators, maybe there is a chance the two could
>be coordinated.  Or at least checked for conflicts?
>
>-- 
>Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO
>  Affiliation given for identification not representation
>
>
That is already an issue at the ATM NAPs, since traffic can't flow until PVCs
are set-up between consenting peers. And we have had some problems in this
area.

So I think the answer is "Yes".

--Kent


~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~
Kent W. England                                     Six Sigma Networks
1655 Landquist Drive, Suite 100              Voice/Fax:   619.632.8400
Encinitas, CA  92024                                kwe at 6SigmaNets.com
   Technical Expertise for PacBell NAP and PacBell Internet Services






More information about the NANOG mailing list