BGP announcements and small providers
davids at wiznet.net
Thu Feb 27 00:00:57 UTC 1997
Would it make you happier if the "big guys", say MCI, Sprint, and
AGIS all agreed to force all their customers to renumber if they ever
changed their own upstream providers?
The "big guys" don't have an 'upstream provider' so their
customers are never inconvenienced by any technical issues surrounding a
change of their provider's upstream provider. That's life.
There are advantages and disadvantages of small versus large
providers. Small providers might change their upstreams. Small providers
typically have poorer network monitoring. Large providers tend to be more
vulnerable to routing instabilities. And on and on. These are not
operational issues though, as far as I can tell.
On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Or is this a "big guys don't have to" thing again? Because if it is, then
> you're right back where you started.
> Karl Denninger (karl at MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity
> http://www.mcs.net/~karl | T1's from $600 monthly to FULL DS-3 Service
> | 99 Analog numbers, 77 ISDN, Web servers $75/mo
> Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| Email to "info at mcs.net" WWW: http://www.mcs.net/
> Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | 2 FULL DS-3 Internet links; 400Mbps B/W Internal
More information about the NANOG