Unsubstantiated Rumor

Sun Feb 9 18:12:55 UTC 1997

From:	MX%"randy at psg.com"  9-FEB-1997 10:01:58.40
To:	MX%"nanog at merit.edu"
Subj:	Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor

Return-Path: <owner-nanog at merit.edu>
Received: from merit.edu by ISDMNL.WR.USGS.GOV (MX V4.1 VAX) with SMTP; Sun, 09
          Feb 1997 10:01:52 PST
Received: from localhost (daemon at localhost) by merit.edu (8.8.5/merit-2.0) with
          SMTP id MAA01011; Sun, 9 Feb 1997 12:59:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: by merit.edu (bulk_mailer v1.5); Sun, 9 Feb 1997 12:55:06 -0500
Received: (from daemon at localhost) by merit.edu (8.8.5/merit-2.0) id MAA00936
          for nanog-outgoing; Sun, 9 Feb 1997 12:55:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rip.psg.com (root at rip.psg.com []) by merit.edu
          (8.8.5/merit-2.0) with SMTP id MAA00931 for <nanog at merit.edu>; Sun, 9
          Feb 1997 12:55:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: by rip.psg.com id m0vtdSv-000800C; Sun, 9 Feb 97 09:55 PST
Message-ID: <m0vtdSv-000800C at rip.psg.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 97 09:55 PST
From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
To: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Re: Unsubstantiated Rumor
References: <01IF7FWWBUZMA23B63 at OMEGA7.WR.USGS.GOV>
            <Pine.BSI.3.95q.970209124243.28620B-100000 at cais2.cais.com>
Sender: owner-nanog at merit.edu

My intention was not to generate discussion, but to raise the flag and
point out the supposed deadline date and the mail address for comments.
I think the proposed Access Tariff is a serious matter.  But I think it
might be better discussed elsewhere, as it is a business not an ops issue,
and is likely to generate some volume for some time.


More information about the NANOG mailing list