test Nets being routed?

Philip J. Nesser II pjnesser at martigny.ai.mit.edu
Tue Dec 23 19:28:09 UTC 1997


Yet another reason to put Andrews list of bogus routes on your systems.
Invariably these announcements pop up from time to time.

If we are lucky Andrew may post the latest set of filters to the list.

--->  Phil



Matthew D. Lammers supposedly said:
> 
> 
> Happy Holidays To You All!
> 
> Am I the only one seeing the 192.168.0.0 test net going somewhere?  RFC 1918
> mandates 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 [192.168/16] for private networks (testing),
> right?  Inc.net seems to have some problems...
> 
> >From 206.183.227.10, I can get to them via telnet...These are
> definately NOT my hosts, either...  :)
> 
> 
> ======
> zeus% telnet 192.168.1.2
> 
> Trying 192.168.1.2 ...
> Connected to 192.168.1.2.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 
> 
> ComOS - Livingston PortMaster
> 
> login:
> 
> ======
> 
> 
> 	And this one:
> 
> 
> ======
> zeus% traceroute 192.168.1.2
> 
>  1  gw0-core0-ser1-eth0.Hilliard.netset.com (206.183.227.1)  1 ms  1 ms  4 ms
>  2  core1-hssi1-NETSET.Columbus.fnsi.net (206.183.239.73)  5 ms  4 ms  4 ms
>  3  aads.nap.net (198.32.130.39)  17 ms  27 ms  19 ms
>  4  aads.atm.inc.net (198.32.130.68)  25 ms  39 ms  21 ms
>  5  baryon.atm.inc.net (207.67.1.3)  21 ms  21 ms  24 ms
>  6  border-233.noc.inc.net (204.95.160.233)  31 ms  24 ms  30 ms
> 
> ======
> 
> Just wanted some other expertise and input....
> 
> Regards,
> -Matt.
> 
> -- 
>   Matthew D. Lammers -- NetSet Internet Solutions, Inc.
>   http://www.netset.com/
> 




More information about the NANOG mailing list