rirving at onecall.net
Wed Dec 10 21:08:37 UTC 1997
Noemi Berry wrote:
> > > > I'd certainly be interested in seeing anything
> >> > anyone has on fragmentation related delays going from a large MTU
> >> > environment to a small MTU switched environment though. Overall, I've
> >> > been less-than-pleased with latency when I've been transited that way.
> >> >
> > Uh... Doctor , it hurts when I do this.
> >Doctor: So don't do that!
> > Hint, it is *pretty* foolish to run mixed MTU's on switched fabric.
> > *Most* people on ATM exchanges run with common MTU's.
> Getting to my NANOG mail kinda late here....
I will say. *grin*
> But WHAT are you guys talking about WRT to MTUs through an ATM switch?
> The MTUs almost always refer to the layer 3 and up MTUs, which the ATM
> switches themselves have no visibility to.
We are discussing Router ATM cards. (Layer 2/3)....
> It's righter to say that
> most people on *any* exchange run with common MTUs.
Don't I wish.
> If you're going from a "large MTU switched environment" to a "small MTU
> switched environment", then you must be passing through a router or some
> other device that understands and sets its own MTU. The ATM layer has
> nothing to do with that. MTU issues are independent of what layer 2
> technology is used to connect the peers.
The point ? You would have a hard time setting an MTU of 4470 on
The object of the game ? If you must fragment, do it *after*
transmission. (If possible)
(Less WAN bandwidth than otherwise)
> I know a thing or two about ATM, but not NAPs, so please correct me if my
> terminology is screwy and I missed something.
Try reading RFC-1626. We are talking about MTU for the IP PLCP card
the ATM fabric. FDDI to ATM to Ethernet, try it , you won't like it. PS
forget ATM is not the only switched fabric in town....
You will find there is a whole PDU and SDU maxsize declaration for
SAR to use on
AAL5 based framing. However, these are *not* the limits you want to be
I know non-mixed MTU's seem obvious, but some don't get it. On the
I have neighbors who have the CHI-NAP fabric declared as /24,
and *cannot* be made to understand why this is bad. ;)
(One Quote: Its the internet, I can do as I want! )
> Noemi Berry
> Network Operations
> Covad Communications
> p.s. (all that said, it's not *entirely* true that the ATM layer has no
> visibility to the higher-layer MTUs: early- and partial- packet discard peeks
> into the ATM cells to see the start and end of AAL5 frames that encapsulate
> layer 3 packets, but it does no fragmentation nor otherwise manipulate the
> layer 3 packet).
More information about the NANOG