Samsung

Fri Aug 15 16:04:40 UTC 1997

Well, I just got another different one yesterday.  It goes on for about 20
pages, but I've listed the headers here.

Received: 
                   from web1.asia1.com.sg (web1.asia1.com.sg [203.116.23.60])
by mail.mc.net (8.8.6/8.8.2)
                   with ESMTP id NAA16092 for <burrito at mc.net>; Thu, 14 Aug
1997 13:37:38 -0500 (CDT)
            From: 
                   webmaster at sec.samsung.com
         Received: 
                   from web1.asia1.com.sg
(1Cust124.max67.los-angeles.ca.ms.uu.net [153.34.103.252]) by
                   web1.asia1.com.sg (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA15949; Fri,
15 Aug 1997 02:20:50 +0800
                   (SGT)
         Received: 
                   from mips-1.sailahead.com (mips-1.sailahead.com
[199.107.95.10]) by samsung.co.kr
                   (8.8.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id GAA03731 for
<Net_Users at in_cyberspace.com>; Thu, 14 Aug
                   1997 11:03:16 -0600 (EST)
             Date: 
                   Thu, 14 Aug 97 11:03:16 EST
               To: 
                   Net_Users at in_cyberspace.com
          Subject: 
                   A Word About Exciting Hih-Tech & Industry
      Message-ID: 
                   <5.0.52.19970916663666.666a6g97 at sailahead.com>
         Reply-To: 
                   public_relations at sosimple.com
     X-PMFLAGS: 
                   34666848 0
        Comments: 
                   Authenticated sender is <webmaster at sec.samsung.com>
          X-UIDL: 
                   3273376668a65ag1890m0762123a
 X-Mozilla-Status: 
                   0001

We at Samsung welcome all Internet subscribers to visit our web 
sites to meet the real Samsung, the high-tech and industrial leader! 

http://www.samsungla.com
http://www/sosimple.com
http://www.samsung.co.kr
http://samsungelectronics.com
http://www.sec.samsung.com

Or write to us c/o:

webmaster at sec.samsung.com 

david at sparks.net wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Dana Hudes wrote:
> 
> > Mea maxima culpa and an apology to Samsung and its law firm.
> > I'm a bit too touchy about spam having had quite a bad experience
> >
> > with it as previously described on this list. This explains but
> > does not
> > excuse my firing off without investigating first.
> > I have read the CyberTimes article, which is NOT in today
> > (8/12/97)
> > NY Times (nor yesterday), which I've read completely.
> > I subscribe to the paper edition and read it
> > or skim it daily 7 days (I'm a New Yorker, some say Times
> > subscription
> > is a residency requirement, at least on the Upper West Side :-)
> > ).
> 
> To save the few old timers still reading the list ......
> 
> What on earth has this to do with nanog?
> 
> Have we completely given up talking about network operations now?
> 
> <sigh>
> 
> --- David
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 It's *amazing* what one can accomplish when
>                     one doesn't know what one can't do!

-- 
Stephen Dolloff
(Systems Administrator - McHenryCom)