UUNET - PSI - ?

Jamie Rishaw jamie at intuition.iagnet.net
Fri Aug 8 00:26:50 UTC 1997


Oh, I'm sorry. This was a technical issue.
You know. One national provider advertising the /16 of another
national provider's *backbone*.

Sorry. I'll refrain from such things like this in the future.

I forgot. Today was an odd-numbered day. Can't talk tech on nanog.

Shame on me. :-P

> >> Something wrong with this?
> >> 
> >> sho ip bgp 137.39.0.0 255.255.0.0
> >> BGP routing table entry for 137.39.0.0/16, version 533944
> >> Paths: (2 available, best #2, advertised over IBGP)
> >>   174
> >>     192.41.177.245 from 192.41.177.245
> >>       Origin IGP, metric 30, localpref 100, valid, external
> >>       Community: 2548:668
> >>   701
> >>     198.32.186.248 from 198.32.186.248 (137.39.3.57)
> >>       Origin IGP, metric 2, localpref 100, valid, external, best
> >>       Community: 2548:668
> >> 
> >> *174*?
> > 
> > What's really criminal is that neither of them have NOCs.
> 
> >From private mail I received, it is clear that I was being too subtle.
> 
> UUNET and PSI have perfectly fine NOCs.  The problem was that Jamie seems
> not to know how to use them and posts to nanog in stead.
> 
> Folk, it is no longer safe to assume that clueful folk from provider X read
> this list.  They have been driven off by the noise.  Some weeks back, folk
> on a private list asked for anyone who still read nanog to copy over any
> useful message.  None have been copied.  This one certainly won't be. :-)
> 
> randy
> 
> 
> PS: This is an actual bug.  I do not think PSI has bought UUNET.
> 


-- 
jamie g.k. rishaw  dal/efnet:gavroche        IAGnet/CICNet/netILLINOIS
'whois JGR2' for PGP keyID/Fingerprint __      Network Operations/TSD
DID:216.902.5455 FAX:216.623.3566      \/         800.637.4IAGx5455
      "The machine's fine. It just doesn't work." -dan at nic.net



More information about the NANOG mailing list