Peering points

Dave Van Allen dave at fast.net
Sun Apr 6 23:46:52 UTC 1997


I'm not trying to imply anything, just that there is a current limit on
customer connections there.  Your routing through Pennsauken seems to be
pretty event free, so maybe Sprint simply wants the NAP to stay optimum
and not overloaded.  This would be a Good Thing. 

Best regards,

David Van Allen - You Tools Corporation / FASTNET(tm)
dave at fast.net (610) 289-1100  http://www.fast.net
FASTNET - PA/NJ/DE Internet Solutions

>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Avi Freedman [SMTP:freedman at netaxs.com]
>Sent:	Sunday, April 06, 1997 7:27 PM
>To:	Dave Van Allen
>Cc:	freedman at netaxs.com; SEAN at SDG.DRA.COM; nanog at merit.edu
>Subject:	Re: Peering points
>
>Interesting...
>We've seen the SprintNAP as a good place to send data to Sprintlink
>and MCI - and UUNET, when we were peering with them there.
>
>Avi
>
>> FYI Sprint is not allowing anything larger than 6Mb from Pensauken,
>> circa April 4, 1997, for customer connections that is.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> David Van Allen - You Tools Corporation / FASTNET(tm)
>> dave at fast.net (610) 289-1100  http://www.fast.net
>> FASTNET - PA/NJ/DE Internet Solutions
>> 
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From:	Avi Freedman [SMTP:freedman at netaxs.com]
>> >Sent:	Saturday, April 05, 1997 5:03 AM
>> >To:	SEAN at SDG.DRA.COM
>> >Cc:	nanog at merit.edu
>> >Subject:	Re: Peering points
>> >
>> >> Or is the entire thing irrelevant, because everyone is moving to private
>> >> bilateral connections.  And the important thing is how many providers
>> >> does someone peer, not how many exchange points they're connected to.
>> >> For the price of one Sprint-NAP connection, I can get several
>>connections
>> >> to Canada.  And we have a lot more customers in Canada than at the
>> >> Sprint-NAP.  We already peer with everyone at the Sprint-NAP, or been
>> >> turned down by them elsewhere.  So one more exchange point doesn't buy
>> >> much.
>> >> -- 
>> >> Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO
>> >>   Affiliation given for identification not representation
>> >
>> >The SprintNAP is a much less congested place than MAE-East (though most
>> >providers also have less capacity out of it [besides Sprintlink, GSL,
>> >ICM, etc...])...
>> >
>> >Avi
>> >
>> 
>





More information about the NANOG mailing list