Peering points

Tue Apr 1 00:27:38 UTC 1997

X-News: sdg.dra.com dra.mail.nanog:8398

>From: nathan at netrail.NET (Nathan Stratton)
>Subject:Re: PC Magazine on Internet logjams
>Date: 30 Mar 1997 21:55:57 -0600
>Message-ID:<dra.mail.nanog.Pine.LNX.3.95.970330223631.954C-100000 at netrail.net>

>On Sun, 30 Mar 1997, Justin W. Newton wrote:
>
>> At 01:49 PM 3/30/97 +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>> >http://www.pcmag.com/issues/1607/pcmg0165.htm
>> >
>> >Breaking Up the Internet Logjam (04/08/97)
>> 
>> Wow, this article is so phenominally inaccurate hat it is almost silly. I
>> wonder who all of the rest of my peering sessions are with if there are
>> only 20 or so providers connected to NAP's.  
>
>Well I think NAP's is referring to more then just 1 NAP. There are under 20
>providers connected to say 4 or 5 major NAP's.
>
>Nathan Stratton                                President, NetRail,Inc.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Phone   (888)NetRail                           NetRail, Inc.
>Fax     (404)522-1939                          230 Peachtree Suite 500
>WWW     http://www.netrail.net/                Atlanta, GA 30303
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about 
>itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own."           Matthew 6:34
>
-- 
Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO
  Affiliation given for identification not representation