Peering versus Transit

Sanjay Dani (maillists) indus at professionals.com
Mon Sep 30 22:14:53 UTC 1996


> From: Vadim Antonov <avg at quake.net>
> Bill Woodcock <woody at zocalo.net> wrote:
> 
> >    WRT the former, I simply cannot fathom, and no one other than Sean has
> >    yet presented an argument explaining why it's malicious to deliver a
> >    packet to its addressee's ISP.
> 
> You should always add "without consent of the said ISP".
> 
> It is no different from dumping a pile of bricks at somebody's property.

Why is it any different than the big ISP's customers dumping
packets on small ISP's web server?

Sanjay.





More information about the NANOG mailing list