The SWAMP

Mon Sep 9 11:26:53 UTC 1996

> Isn't the argument of the non-default routing tables growing by an
> additional 13 entries or not is specious noise? The routing bucket is
> leaking through bloody great open chasms and we are wondering about
> the incremental damage throuigh a pinhole!

The 13 additional entries are not the issue.  The issue is one of
setting a bad high-profile example.

Any suggestions for closing the open chasms in the routing
bucket?

- Havard