AGIS/DIGEX
Robert Bowman
rob at elite.exodus.net
Wed Oct 30 06:41:58 UTC 1996
I agree completely with everything you stated.
Now I promise to all those visually impaired, I will take this offline.
Rob
>
>
> In my opinion you are all overlooking one issue here. Our customers are the
> reason we exist and providing global connectivity to customers is important.
> Happy customers are important. If anyone forced you to peer with us,
> I would have to say it was your customer who called you up and requested
> that his company be able to access our network. The fellow I talked to
> at Exodus felt the way I do and believed that if one of his customers
> needed something that he was going to do his best to make it happen.
> Again, not to harp on this particular situation, I just want to express that
> many of these providers with the really strict peering policies have
> some very unhappy customers (I have talked to quite a few of them). They
> are unhappy because they can't get to all the destinations they need to. I
> think in the end the customers will vote by connecting elsewhere.
>
> Thanks!
> ---Cathy
>
>
>
> From: Robert Bowman <rob at elite.exodus.net>
> Subject: Re: AGIS/DIGEX
> The point was not who did what to whom. The point was bending policies due
> to certain circumstances and forced peering due to these.
> I do recall you having transit via geonet for a while however on the network in
> question. Same issue, on a much smaller scale, than AGIS/Digex situation.
> I agree with taking this offline, and discussing the "issue" rather than the
> particular situation between our networks.
>
> rob
>
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Robert Bowman <rob at elite.exodus.net>
> > Subject: Re: AGIS/DIGEX
> > This is all very interesting information. It seems at-home recently did
> > the same thing with us, as they stopped all transit and were not on CIX,
> > basically forcing us to peer with them. Is this the route to get peering
> > with the big players that will now evolve? Forced peering due to
> > unreachability?
> >
> > We did no such thing. We never had connectivity to you
> > and one of your customers called us and requested that we fix it so
> > that they could work with our content group. If you would like to
> > discuss this further please feel free to contact me.
> >
> > Thanks
> > ---Cathy
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Cathy Wittbrodt @Home Network
> > Network Manager 385 Ravendale
> > Mountain View, CA 94043
> > Main Number: 415-944-7200
> > Direct: 415-944-7213
> >
> >
>
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list