a multihomed net
Miguel A.L. Paraz
map at iphil.net
Wed Oct 23 14:22:30 UTC 1996
Hi,
Paul A Vixie wrote:
> So don't let's talk any longer about multihoming requiring PI space.
> I did this whole thing with an almost-stock BSD/OS 2.1 system (other than
> the "socket" command which is off the net from way back.)
Yeah, application-level multihoming is great, considering most folks only
need a couple of applications. :) Also, it is very applicable for
our part of the world, where bandwidth costs are humongous, and BGP-
capable routers come at inflated prices.
--
miguel a.l. paraz <map at iphil.net> http://www.iphil.net/~map/ PGP: 0x43F0D011
iphil communications: isp/intranet design and implementation, makati city, ph
More information about the NANOG
mailing list