Cisco Memory.

Tue Oct 22 01:32:44 UTC 1996

On Mon, 21 Oct 1996, Avi Freedman wrote:

> > Nathan,
> > 
> >    I have to follow up on this comment you made.  I work for an ISP in
> > Indianapolis called IHETS.  We have 7 cisco 7500 series routers on our
> > backbone.  Wre just spent a chunck of money to upgrade the RAM on them to
> > 64Meg.  If yoiu are saying that regular SIMMS work in Cicso routers, then I'll
> > shoot myself in the foot.  I'd like to know if you have used this method and
> > how well it works out in the field.  Does latency increase with *unqualified*
> > Cisco memory, or is the *unqualified* *qualified* Cisco ram stuff just a big
> > ruse?  Thanks for your input.
> 
> I'd pay attention if they disqualify memory.
> 
> But we've found that standard x36 16mb 70pin (60ns) simms work fine in
> 7500s.  I suspect it'd either work or not - you won't get added latency...

I have used 70ns with no prob, but good to go with 60ns to be safe. 

Nathan Stratton		  CEO, NetRail, Inc.    Tracking the future today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone   (703)524-4800                          NetRail, Inc.
Fax     (703)534-5033                          2007 N. 15 St. Suite 5
Email   sales at netrail.net                      Arlington, Va. 22201
WWW     http://www.netrail.net/                Access: (703) 524-4802 guest
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about 
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own."               Matthew 6:34