GigaRouter (Was Re: Cisco as Big Brother))

Mon Oct 21 16:48:31 UTC 1996

Begin forwarded message:

Subject: Re: GigaRouter (Was Re: Cisco as Big Brother))
To: freedman at netaxs.com (Avi Freedman)
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 17:46:54 +0400 (AMT)
Cc: alex at relcom.eu.net, nanog at merit.edu, paul at vix.com
In-Reply-To: <199610211323.JAA25866 at access.netaxs.com> from "Avi  
Freedman" at Oct 21, 96 09:23:08 am
From: edd at acm.org
Sender: owner-nanog at merit.edu

the livingston comparision is not even warrented, they lack any  
real extensible functionality (only RIP for one exam.)

and with over 30% failure rate on hardware, don't even think about it.

> Bay is not.  Proteon is not.  Gated (for me, so far) is not.
> Microrouters are not.  Morningstars are/(?were?).  Livingstons
> are not.

Why Livingstons are not??? They're terribly easy to configure, IMHO...

> > Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
>
> I can only speak for myself, of course.

Me too,

Ed