Intra/Inter - was Inet-II
Curtis Villamizar
curtis at ans.net
Mon Oct 14 15:48:43 UTC 1996
In message <2.2.32.19961013021241.006b47b0 at lint.cisco.com>, Paul Ferguson write
s:
> Herr Manning,
>
> At 11:15 AM 10/11/96 -0700, bmanning at ISI.EDU wrote:
>
> >>
> >> You mean that routing protocols need to take account of policies? ;-)
> >>
> >> Or do you mean that BGP isn't good enough?
> >>
> >> Michael Dillon - ISP & Internet Consulting
> >
> >Yes... (silly :)
> >Yes... (serious)
> >
> >BGP has a number of serious flaws. The more complex the routing mesh, the
> >more they will become visable. And if what I see is correct, IDRP, the
> >BGP heir, has the same sets of problems.
> >
>
> Another suggestion? Lacking one, one might suggest that the complexity
> of the 'mesh' needs to be simplified.
>
> - paul
Paul,
It's that sloppy multiprovider model. Let's go back to one NSFNET
core. :-)
Curtis
ps- For the *extremely* humor impaired -- I'm just joking. I'm not
seriously suggesting that. I am suggesting to Paul through (friendly)
sarcasm that we have to live with routing complexity.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list