Intra/Inter - was Inet-II

Bill Manning bmanning at ISI.EDU
Fri Oct 11 00:39:57 UTC 1996


> > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 14:16:53 -0700
> > From: Vadim Antonov <avg at quake.net>
> > To: kwe at 6SigmaNets.com, swolff at cisco.com
> > Subject: Re: Internet II is coming...
> > Cc: mathis at psc.edu, nanog at merit.edu
> > 	[...]
> > Oh, no, not AUP again!
> > 
> > What a mess.
> 
> I don't think so, really.
> 
> This time around, the AUP will not be at the functional core of the
> Internet, plus most people will be on the AUP-free side of things.
> 
> -tjs

	Hi again,
		Please note that firewalls, Intranets, Market-segment
		nets (eg ANX, Inet-II, and the raft of MRNs) all are
		there -because- of AUPs.  And yes it is a mess and
		it creates business opportunities and things would
		be much better if we could all get along and do things
		-my- way. :)
		AUPs are a fact of life.  We (as a community) have
		to figure out how to deal with support of thousands
		of AUPs in a global internet.

		Just my 0.02 rembi.

-- 
--bill





More information about the NANOG mailing list