mae-west corrigenda
Paul Ferguson
pferguso at cisco.com
Sat May 25 13:54:49 UTC 1996
Gordon:
http://www.ra.net/.rs.overview.html
- paul
At 09:23 AM 5/25/96 -0400, Gordon Cook wrote:
>Sean is usually very careful with his choice of words but in this instance
>I am afraid I don't understand the use of "compromised".
>
>Also I have a question. Leaving aside the question of commercial use... I
>am in St Petersburg Russia now....which is why, unfortunately I will miss
>a Nanog meeting that is otherwise physically near me, and I will not tackle
>*this* issue from here, Sean in an earlier comment implied that if sprint
>were running a RS like the one at Mae West, it could be profitable because
>it would be a good easy and cheap source of peering for other ISPs.
>Would Sean or someone else elaborate on this? For example I didn't think
>it was the case that if Sprint is now using the services of the RA
>that being connected to the route server at MAE west would have been the
>same thing as having full peering with Sprint? Exactly what kind of
>connectivity DO you get from the use of the RS there or anywhere eles
>assuming that the RS is working.
>
>**********************************************************************
>The COOK Report on Internet Individ. hard copy $150
>431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA Small Corp & Gov't $200
>(609) 882-2572 phone and fax Corporate $350
>Internet: cook at cookreport.com Corporate Site Lic. $650
>http://pobox.com/cook/ for new report: "Tracking Internet Infrastructure"
>***********************************************************************
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list