that observation....
Paul Ferguson
pferguso at cisco.com
Wed May 1 20:21:47 UTC 1996
This definately a keeper for the personal archives. :-)
- paul
At 01:08 PM 5/1/96 -0700, bmanning at ISI.EDU wrote:
>Forwarded w/o attribution.
>(perhaps this is not appropriate but I do feel this way alot... :)
> -bill
>
>There are really only <n> discussions on NANOG/CIDRD, which
>occasionally flare up like spontaneously combusting drunks on rs-talk,
>iepg, and ietf as well. Herein, a kind of Meta-FAQ, a Field Guide to
>the Meta-Wars:
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list