that observation....

Paul Ferguson pferguso at
Wed May 1 20:21:47 UTC 1996

This definately a keeper for the personal archives.  :-)

- paul

At 01:08 PM 5/1/96 -0700, bmanning at ISI.EDU wrote:

>Forwarded w/o attribution.
>(perhaps this is not appropriate but I do feel this way alot... :)
>						-bill
>There are really only <n> discussions on NANOG/CIDRD, which
>occasionally flare up like spontaneously combusting drunks on rs-talk,
>iepg, and ietf as well.  Herein, a kind of Meta-FAQ, a Field Guide to
>the Meta-Wars:

More information about the NANOG mailing list