Interesting AP Article
pferguso at cisco.com
Thu Mar 14 00:17:06 UTC 1996
Perhaps it is 'interesting' because this issue has made it into
the mainstream popular press?
At 11:24 PM 3/13/96 +0000, Larry J. Plato wrote:
>I am not really trying to flame you but why is this article
>interesting? It is really a poorly written rehash of the
>filtering policy Sprint has discussed for the last 18 months.
>I don't agree w/ Sprint's position but I don't see this
>article as being particularly interesting. It's not even
>very well written. If anything I find it annoying and
>irresponsible that the author did not seem, IMHO, to
>research his topic very well. As far as I can tell he neither
>asked the opinion of Sprint, or any other major NSP, as to why
>someone would do this. Yet he had the call to title his
>article "Sprint says ..."
>I think this is sloppy, yellow, journalism.
>I speak for myself only
More information about the NANOG