tilting at windmills discussion 2

Dorian Kim dorian at cic.net
Wed Jun 19 07:29:34 UTC 1996


On Tue, 18 Jun 1996, Jerry Scharf wrote:

> the overhead for various framing methods. Hopefully taking
> empirical data from the internet and giving people code will reduce
> the discussions of what the "cell tax" for real traffic is. Don't
> like my traffic, collect your own. Fighting over conclusions will
> be left to others.

In a similar vein, something to think about:

IP packet size distribution (970780293  total packets):
   1-32   64   96  128  160  192  224  256  288  320  352  384  416  448  480
   .000 .497 .094 .013 .009 .006 .007 .010 .010 .014 .004 .005 .002 .002 .002
	^^^^
    512  544  576 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096 4608
   .004 .002 .189 .000 .069 .053 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

Collected at a private interconnect between CICNet, OARnet and OSU. over a
period of a week or so.

-dorian






More information about the NANOG mailing list