tilting at windmills discussion 2
Dorian Kim
dorian at cic.net
Wed Jun 19 07:29:34 UTC 1996
On Tue, 18 Jun 1996, Jerry Scharf wrote:
> the overhead for various framing methods. Hopefully taking
> empirical data from the internet and giving people code will reduce
> the discussions of what the "cell tax" for real traffic is. Don't
> like my traffic, collect your own. Fighting over conclusions will
> be left to others.
In a similar vein, something to think about:
IP packet size distribution (970780293 total packets):
1-32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256 288 320 352 384 416 448 480
.000 .497 .094 .013 .009 .006 .007 .010 .010 .014 .004 .005 .002 .002 .002
^^^^
512 544 576 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096 4608
.004 .002 .189 .000 .069 .053 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
Collected at a private interconnect between CICNet, OARnet and OSU. over a
period of a week or so.
-dorian
More information about the NANOG
mailing list