Address allocation stats

Bill Manning bmanning at isi.edu
Wed Jun 5 07:10:49 UTC 1996


> 
> >>
> >> Thank you, kind sir. This is exactly what I was looking for:
> >>
> >> [may '96 figures]
> >>
> >>  Grand Total (Allocated and Assigned Combined)
> >>  Class A -     127
> >		 128  <--  :)
> 
> Bit pattern 0xxxxxxx	Class A (0-127)
> Bit pattern 10xxxxxx	Class B (128-191)
> Bit pattern 110xxxxx	Class C	(192-223)
> Bit pattern 1110xxxx	Class D (224-239)
> 
> I give up.  Where did I go wrong that I think net 128.x.y.z is in the
> old style class B range?
> 
> >>  Class B -   10150
> >>  Class C -  764202
> >>
	  You did not go wrong, look at the way Paul did the distribution.
	  For that matter, look at you supplied bit patterns.
	  0 to 127 is how many?   128!!  :)

	  (side note...  Net zero will be harder to reclaim than net 127)
	  (any takers?  :)
-- 
--bill





More information about the NANOG mailing list