Portability of 206 address space
Avi Freedman
freedman at netaxs.com
Tue Jun 4 01:34:29 UTC 1996
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Anyone know whether Internic has issued an edict mandating
> > non-portability of provider obtained 206 address space, such
> > as /18's within this block?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mike
> >
> Please clarify "portable" as used in this context.
>
> - Routable between different providers
> - Transferable intoto between ISPs
> - Transferable subsets
> - Some other meaning
>
> No delegation registry can claim any prefix portability if
> the first option is the meaning. The second has applicability
> to various proposals for a prefix market once a delegation
> has been made. (no Internic involvment) The third is strictly
> between ISPs and thier clients and has a lot to do with
> prefix migration (nee punching holes in CIDR blocks) and nothing
> to do with the Internic. And then there is your possible
> other meaning...
>
> For the first three, the Internic has zero sane reason for
> issuing any "edict" wrt portability. That is strictly an
> ISP issue. The fourth... ??? :)
>
>
> --bill
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list