Address allocation stats
bmanning at isi.edu
Wed Jun 5 07:10:49 UTC 1996
> >> Thank you, kind sir. This is exactly what I was looking for:
> >> [may '96 figures]
> >> Grand Total (Allocated and Assigned Combined)
> >> Class A - 127
> > 128 <-- :)
> Bit pattern 0xxxxxxx Class A (0-127)
> Bit pattern 10xxxxxx Class B (128-191)
> Bit pattern 110xxxxx Class C (192-223)
> Bit pattern 1110xxxx Class D (224-239)
> I give up. Where did I go wrong that I think net 128.x.y.z is in the
> old style class B range?
> >> Class B - 10150
> >> Class C - 764202
You did not go wrong, look at the way Paul did the distribution.
For that matter, look at you supplied bit patterns.
0 to 127 is how many? 128!! :)
(side note... Net zero will be harder to reclaim than net 127)
(any takers? :)
More information about the NANOG