Have we started to chop up the B-space into /24's.
GAVRON at ACES.COM
Tue Jan 30 18:47:28 UTC 1996
>As I recall, at some point Internic was handing out subnets
>of old class B space and reserving the remaining subnets for the same
>organisation. If that's the case here then, 188.8.131.52/16
>should be advertised sprintlink instead of 184.108.40.206/24.
Nice thought, except it doesn't work in practice.
We have 169.197.0/18. When we advertise it, Sean's
filters prevent ICM/ICP from getting it. When we
mis-advertise it as /16 the filter lets us through.
My two messages to INSC, 2 to engineer at sl, and 4 to Sean
didn't generate any solutions, so what makes you think
it will work for 220.127.116.11/24?
More information about the NANOG