Have we started to chop up the B-space into /24's.
ipasha at ulysses.sprintlink.net
Tue Jan 30 17:44:08 UTC 1996
As I recall, at some point Internic was handing out subnets
of old class B space and reserving the remaining subnets for the same
organisation. If that's the case here then, 184.108.40.206/16
should be advertised sprintlink instead of 220.127.116.11/24.
On Tue, 30 Jan 1996, Peter Lothberg wrote:
> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 17:50:09 +0000
> From: William griffin <wgriffin at mci.net>
> To: insc at sprintlink.net
> Cc: trouble at mci.net, pp000314 at interamp.com
> Subject: route not being advertised
> We have a customer with the following address: 18.104.22.168/24 and it seems
> that you are not accepting our advertising of it. Could you please adv.
> The darkness illuminates the light.
> William Griffin
> Network Engineer
> wgriffin at mci.net
More information about the NANOG