[NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd)
Paul Ferguson
pferguso at cisco.com
Tue Feb 13 16:52:38 UTC 1996
Simon,
That's what CIDR is all about; the geographical allocation of
addresses/prefixes at the point of Internet connectivity for the
purposes of aggregation. If there is no sanity in address allocation,
we cannot solve the problem.
- paul
At 01:15 AM 2/13/96 +0000, Simon Chan wrote:
>The unfortunate requirement of such scheme to work is that
>all address space allocated to the small ISP's has to be contiquous so that it
>could be aggregated to a larger prefix under an autonomous system.
>Given the completely arbitrary manner adopted by the Internic's
>address allocation policy, (eg. 4 C's to ISP A, skip a few C's, 8 C's
>to ISP B where A and B can be 4,000 miles apart) it is safe to assume
>that the small chunks of C class addresses are geographically
>dispersed throughout the States with many holes still unassigned or
>unaccounted for. If you are talking about swamp, this is it.
>However, a survey for how those chunks of address got broken up into
>many different places perhaps can help in the direction of finding
>such solution. If these small IP pieces can be grouped together
>according to their geographic locations, there is chance that some
>broken chunks may be pieced together to form large enough piece by
>pure luck. If such solution exists, I am sure someone would be
>interested in forming such regional consortiums to help salvage the once lost
>IP addresses.
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list