Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
bmanning at ISI.EDU
bmanning at ISI.EDU
Fri Feb 2 19:55:34 UTC 1996
>
>
> In message <199602021407.AA25614 at zephyr.isi.edu>, Bill Manning writes:
> >
> > There were a couple of methods suggested here:
> >
> > preemptive hijacking -
> > voluntary return -
> > periodic fees -
> >
> > Hijacking has a number of interesting problems
>
> Bill,
>
> There is no need to call it hijacking.
>
> If an organization registered an address they are responsible for
> keeping the contact name up to date.
The kicker is, where are they keeping the data?
InterNIC ?
DDNnic?
RIPEncc?
The problem is compounded with the InterNIC and the DDNnic
keeping authoritative data over the same space. Can you say
"SRI connected/unconnected database problems"... sure you can.
> This should help with the 60% that can't be contacted. Yes - I know
> this is work, so don't take this as a complaint that you are doing
> something you should be, just a suggestion for dealing with this
> problem.
In fact, that is exactly why a robot mailer is not a cureall.
The process followed is close to yoru description. Hence a
slower pace of progress than many would like. This swamp is
-deep-.
--bill
More information about the NANOG
mailing list