Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
pferguso at cisco.com
Fri Feb 2 03:27:36 UTC 1996
At 02:16 PM 2/2/96 +1100, Geoff Huston wrote:
>> > We are working on the 192.x.x.x swamp right now.
>> > Rough estimates (with much more accurate data @ NANOG)
>> > 60% - invalid or missing contact information
>> This is interesting. How about a policy that says if nobody can contact you
>> and none of your addresses are reachable, then after some period, your
>> addresses get recycled.
>How about a policy which says that if you fail to pay an annual amount
>by a due date then a process is commenced with an outcome such that
>your registration details expire and the associated number space is no
>longer registered to you.
Would this process, perhaps, be associated with a route announcement
More information about the NANOG