NAP/ISP Saturation WAS: Re: Exchanges that matter...
Nathan Stratton
nathan at netrail.net
Fri Dec 20 15:06:27 UTC 1996
On Fri, 20 Dec 1996, Jim Van Baalen wrote:
> I have a question that fits this topic. Why does everybody seem to be so
> sold on Gigaswitch based Xchange points? I know that the busiest, highest
> membership NAPs are of this design, but with all the associated problems
I think the biggest reason the busiest and highest membership NAPs are
using Gigaswitches because they work. When we were looking for a switch for
the Atlanta-NAP we almost with with a Stratacom switch, but the Gigaswitch
looked like a better start. We plan on adding a Stratacom
> It is my opinion that the most promising architecture today is PBNap. The
> StrataCom switches far exceed Gigaswitch in addressing issues such as flow
> control, buffering, and aggregate throughput (which may not be comparable
> when, as with Gigaswitch, port congestion is such a bottleneck). In addition,
> with new line cards due out early next year, the BPXs will support ABR and,
> relatively speaking, huge buffers at high density OC3 and 2 port OC12.
Well when they get that out, and fix a few other problems it may be ready.
> I know that ATM is a nasty word (or should I say acronym) to many on this list,
> but even some of the greatest ATM critics admit that it is a reasonable LAN
> technology. As far as the popular packet shredder (sp?) argument goes, I don't
> think that it relevant on any switch that supports EPD.
>
> Just curious to see other perspectives.
>
> Jim
>
Nathan Stratton CEO, NetRail, Inc. Tracking the future today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone (703)524-4800 NetRail, Inc.
Fax (703)534-5033 2007 N. 15 St. Suite 5
Email sales at netrail.net Arlington, Va. 22201
WWW http://www.netrail.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Matthew 6:34
More information about the NANOG
mailing list