Nanog list uncharacteristically quiet?
Paul Ferguson
pferguso at cisco.com
Sun Dec 15 21:56:09 UTC 1996
This is pretty much consistent with flow-data that I have seen from
other places in the net.
- paul
At 12:04 PM 12/15/96 -0700, Brett D. Watson wrote:
>
>core1.sjc1#sh ip ca f
>IP packet size distribution (219413380 total packets):
> 1-32 64 96 128 160 192 224 256 288 320 352 384 416 448 480
> .000 .388 .040 .014 .017 .014 .023 .013 .030 .026 .014 .010 .004 .004 .004
>
> 512 544 576 1024 1536 2048 2560 3072 3584 4096 4608
> .044 .003 .143 .000 .102 .097 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
>
>IP Flow Switching Cache, 22757 active, 42779 inactive, 9734878 added
> 0 flows exported, 0 not exported, 0 export msgs sent
> 5 cur max hash, 13 worst max hash, 20773 valid buckets
> 0 flow alloc failures
> statistics cleared 36123 seconds ago
>
>Protocol Total Flows Packets Bytes Packets Active(Sec)
Idle(Sec)
>-------- Flows /Sec /Flow /Pkt /Sec /Flow /Flow
>TCP-Telnet 15886 0.4 159 78 70.1 97.7 44.3
>TCP-FTP 175819 4.8 6 72 31.0 6.1 45.9
>TCP-FTPD 34862 0.9 280 591 270.4 82.3 44.7
>TCP-WWW 5135690 142.1 20 391 2848.3 12.3 45.9
>TCP-SMTP 179682 4.9 18 178 94.0 7.1 45.8
>TCP-X 838 0.0 157 127 3.6 86.3 45.4
>TCP-BGP 4298 0.1 90 113 10.7 322.8 39.4
>TCP-Frag 679 0.0 19 733 0.3 22.0 45.2
>TCP-other 399609 11.0 181 411 2008.3 65.7 44.9
>UDP-DNS 2411976 66.7 5 132 339.2 14.9 45.5
>UDP-NTP 164740 4.5 2 76 9.4 1.2 45.9
>UDP-TFTP 2 0.0 2 69 0.0 0.0 59.8
>UDP-Frag 42 0.0 2747 173 3.1 436.4 35.7
>UDP-other 759665 21.0 22 227 466.6 7.5 45.5
>ICMP 429570 11.8 7 88 93.3 19.8 44.7
>IGMP 85 0.0 1707 102 4.0 1670.4 6.2
>IPINIP 370 0.0 13 114 0.1 55.0 45.1
>GRE 119 0.0 245 139 0.8 1810.6 4.0
>IP-other 1490 0.0 31 123 1.2 64.0 43.9
>Total: 9715422 268.9 23 365 6256.0 15.3 45.7
>
>
> web flows obviously beat the pants off of most everything else (big
>surprise). it seems odd to me that idle seconds/flow are pretty much
>equal regardless of the protocol. bytes/packet is under 500
>(average) for just about all protocols. lots of tiny packets
>floating around.
>
>-brett
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list