enke at mci.net
Thu Aug 1 20:57:08 UTC 1996
Give me a break. Do you really believe that this msg is
appropriate for the NANOG mailing list?
If you want to talk to Alternet, then talk to Alternet
> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 12:59:53 -0700 (MST)
> From: Ehud Gavron <GAVRON at ACES.COM>
> To: nanog at merit.edu
> CC: GAVRON at ACES.COM
> A customer of mine owns a cidr block they haven't been using.
> They've asked me to advertise it. I note that this block is
> being advertised by an ALTERNET customer.
> The nic / radb agree with my customer:
> HEARTS:[GAVRON.INTERNET]_whois 188.8.131.52
> B3 Corporation (NETBLK-B3NET-EC)
> 2521 W. Arnold St.
> Marshfield, WI 54449
> Netname: B3NET-EC
> Netblock: 184.108.40.206 - 220.127.116.11
> Note that the ``unscrupulous other isp'' has gotten inverse:
> Domain System inverse mapping provided by:
> NS.CYBERCONNECTION.COM 18.104.22.168
> RADB says:
> route: 22.214.171.124/19
> descr: US Cyber (sm)
> descr: 2451 W Arnold Street
> descr: Marshfield
> descr: WI 54449, USA
> origin: AS4136
> comm-list: COMM_NSFNET
> advisory: AS690 1:4136
> mnt-by: MAINT-AS4136
> changed: nsfnet-admin at merit.edu 950505
> source: RADB
> But the route is being annouced by ``cyberconnection'' out of AS701.
> Ideas? Should I just advertise this and to hell with the backbones?
More information about the NANOG