Routes and routing tables

Jon Zeeff jon at
Sun Apr 28 00:31:07 UTC 1996

Sounds like a good reason to agressively aggregate, unless people indicate
that there are reasons (like part of the /16 is dual homed) for not doing 
so for specific blocks.

I prefer this over most of the "not routing larger prefixes" thing.

> In certain circumstances, the people will advertise every class C in a /16 as
> well as advertising the /16.  It's turned into something worse than pre-CIDR.

More information about the NANOG mailing list