Routes and routing tables
jon at branch.com
Sun Apr 28 00:31:07 UTC 1996
Sounds like a good reason to agressively aggregate, unless people indicate
that there are reasons (like part of the /16 is dual homed) for not doing
so for specific blocks.
I prefer this over most of the "not routing larger prefixes" thing.
> In certain circumstances, the people will advertise every class C in a /16 as
> well as advertising the /16. It's turned into something worse than pre-CIDR.
More information about the NANOG