ed at texas.net
Sat Apr 6 20:59:06 UTC 1996
Agreed, to some extent. Mr. Metcalfe put his foot in his mouth
a couple of times with gross mis-statements, and would not back off.
Instead of listening to the practicing professionals, he threw his
legacy weight around. His contributions to the list may be wonderful,
but he has to get off of his high horse, first. Contrary to what it
seems like he thought, he will not set the tone here. Instead, he has
to listen to our tone, get into the groove, and work *with* us instead
of *against* us.
ed (probably one of the youngest here)
On Sat, 6 Apr 1996, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> Craig came down very hard on Bob Metcalfe and I was hoping that over
> the past few days someone would step in and explain that Bob is far
> from being a clueless journalist. I believe Craig is just showing
> how young he is. Bob Metcalfe along with David Boggs published in
> ACM (July 1976) an article entitled "Ethernet - Distributed Packet
> Switching for Local Computer Networks". This paper was the groundwork
> for Ethernet - without which we would still be using X.25 and possibly
> no LANs. Having Bob (as well as a few other heavyweights) on this list,
> we can only come to a better understanding of the routing, addressing
> and portability problems of the Internet that we are all hitting.
> Craig, Bob has probably forgotten more than you and I will ever know.
More information about the NANOG