192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role)

• Previous message (by thread): 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role)
• Next message (by thread): 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> As part of the educational effort you might want to add information about
> 	IPng (IPv6) as well as RFC 1918...this may help to give people hope...

Until there's an operational plan for simplifying routing by using IPng,
I think we'll avoid mentioning it since it begs the question "If we can't
route 2^32 addresses..."

> Jim Fleming

Avi

• Previous message (by thread): 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role)
• Next message (by thread): 192/8 survey (was Re: NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]