NANOG/IEPG/ISOC's current role
jon at branch.com
Tue Apr 2 19:23:03 UTC 1996
> it has) and a viable alternative is presented, I suspect Sprint will
> be interested in cooperating in the best interest of the Internet, and
> at least give any new ideas an objective audience.
We have a request in to Sprint to make an exception to their policy.
We will renumber, resulting in a reduced number of route
annoucements. I'd like to think that what you say is correct - we'll
More information about the NANOG