number of unaggregated class C's in swamp?
Curtis Villamizar
curtis at ans.net
Fri Sep 29 18:54:07 UTC 1995
In message <1621.bsimpson at morningstar.com>, "William Allen Simpson" writes:
> > From: Brian Renaud <renaud at merit.edu>
> > Here is the breakdown of 198 in the radb, showing the number of
> > route objects registered in 198 for /14 through /24.
> >
> > prefix length
> > prefix 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
> > ------ ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
> > 198.* 4 5 39 5 19 30 41 67 98 137 5314
> >
> This is interesting, showing how bad assignment has been even
> _after_ CIDR. 5K sites migrating providers in 2 years.
More likely 5K /24s that were nver aggregated in the first place.
What leads you to the conclusion that these were ever aggregated and
had to punch a hole because they moved?
Curtis
More information about the NANOG
mailing list