number of unaggregated class C's in swamp?

Curtis Villamizar curtis at ans.net
Fri Sep 29 18:54:07 UTC 1995


In message <1621.bsimpson at morningstar.com>, "William Allen Simpson" writes:
> > From: Brian Renaud <renaud at merit.edu>
> > Here is the breakdown of 198 in the radb, showing the number of
> > route objects registered in 198 for /14 through /24.
> >
> >                         prefix length
> > prefix   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24
> > ------ ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
> >  198.*    4    5   39    5   19   30   41   67   98  137 5314
> >
> This is interesting, showing how bad assignment has been even
> _after_ CIDR.  5K sites migrating providers in 2 years.

More likely 5K /24s that were nver aggregated in the first place.
What leads you to the conclusion that these were ever aggregated and
had to punch a hole because they moved?

Curtis



More information about the NANOG mailing list