Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif.
tli at cisco.com
Mon Sep 25 00:13:39 UTC 1995
I expect that if Sprintlink were to propose a rational plan to
renumber and -return- the older delegations that they would be
provided with a large, single block that Sean could pursuade
Sprintlink to carve up in the fashion that he indicated.
Methinks that this is backwards. Sprintlink clearly has a rational
plan. Obviously they cannot possibly return an older delegation until
they can get more address space.
It would go a long way in reducing the size of the global routing
I count 45 prefixes.
IMHO, someone needs to be following RIPE's guidelines and should be
assigning shorter prefixes to Sprint on a per-block basis.
More information about the NANOG