Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif.
bmanning at ISI.EDU
bmanning at ISI.EDU
Sun Sep 24 16:32:55 UTC 1995
>
> I don't think that this will work for a business viewpoint - someone
> will end up giving at least some of these ISPs free transit.
>
> See the attached message that I sent to big-internet earlier this
> month. My comments apply to metro-based addressing or
> interconnect-based addressing or similar schemes.
> --asp at uunet.uu.net (Andrew Partan)
>
The one way around this is to have all of the players participating
in such a scheme form a "co-op", so that "long-haul" folks only
sign one transit agreement, with the co-op.
A few tweeks to the MPLA's at the AADS and PACBELL NAPS, regarding
this technique might fly. At least they are a starting point for such
discussions.
--
--bill
More information about the NANOG
mailing list