Request for Comments on a topological address block for N. Calif.

bmanning at ISI.EDU bmanning at ISI.EDU
Sun Sep 24 16:32:55 UTC 1995


> 
> I don't think that this will work for a business viewpoint - someone
> will end up giving at least some of these ISPs free transit.
> 
> See the attached message that I sent to big-internet earlier this
> month.  My comments apply to metro-based addressing or
> interconnect-based addressing or similar schemes.
> 	--asp at uunet.uu.net (Andrew Partan)
> 

	The one way around this is to have all of the players participating
	in such a scheme form a "co-op", so that "long-haul" folks only
	sign one transit agreement, with the co-op.

	A few tweeks to the MPLA's at the AADS and PACBELL NAPS, regarding
	this technique might fly.  At least they are a starting point for such
	discussions.

-- 
--bill




More information about the NANOG mailing list