MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd)
Enke Chen
enke at mci.net
Wed Oct 4 16:20:42 UTC 1995
Hi,
Currently MCI peers with Sprintlink at four places: Mae-East,
Mae-West, New York NAP, and Chicago NAP, and these peers do
backup each other. I just checked the peer status a few
minutes ago. Here is what I found:
interconnect up time
Mae-East 6:06:45 (sheduled maintainence this morning)
Mae-West 3d04
NY NAP 4d20
Chicago NAP 1w6d
Clearly this data does not support the remark that a
partition (total loss of peers) happened between MCI and
Sprint yesterday evening.
-- Enke
>Anyone willing to say what happened?
>
>********************************************************************
>Gordon Cook, Editor & Publisher Subscript.: Individ-ascii $85
>The COOK Report on Internet Non Profit. $150
>431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 Small Corp & Gov't $200
>(609) 882-2572 Corporate $350
>Internet: cook at cookreport.com Corporate. Site Lic $650
>http://www.netaxs.com/~cook <- Subscription Info & COOK Report Index
>********************************************************************
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>To: cook at cookreport.com
>Subject: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned (fwd)
>
>Forwarded message:
>>From spot.Colorado.EDU!westnet-site-people-request Tue Oct 3 20:48:25 1995
>From: Chris Garner <cgarner at westnet.net>
>Message-Id: <199510040136.TAA06094 at dozer.colorado.edu>
>Subject: MCI and SprintLink are partitioned
>To: westnet-site-people at westnet.net
>Date: Tue, 3 Oct 1995 19:36:50 -0600 (MDT)
>X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
>Content-Type: text
>Content-Length: 289
>
>
> MCI and SprintLink are disconnected at the moment. MCI is
>having a BGP problem with SprintLink. Currently the two networks
>are partitioned. The problem started just after 7pm (Mountain time)
>and is still occuring.
>
>
> -Chris (cgarner at westnet.net)
More information about the NANOG
mailing list