Routing wars pending?
Tim Bass
bass at dune.silkroad.com
Thu Nov 16 18:22:23 UTC 1995
Absolutely agree with both Robert and Vadim that DNS need to be revised
in a big way. I especially would like to see the MX record concept
applied to information services (IX maybe), i.e.
foo.bar.org. IN A 198.133.151.19
IX 10 fooU2.bar.org.
IX 20 foo2U2.bar.org.
IX 30 whoU2.maybe.com.
IX 40 tryMe2.friendly.com.
www.bar.org. IN CNAME foo.bar.org.
Has this simple concept been proposed in an IETF draft unknown to
us ugly ducklings :-)
Quack.
Tim
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Tim Bass | #include<campfire.h> |
| Principal Network Systems Engineer | for(beer=100;beer>1;beer++){ |
| The Silk Road Group, Ltd. | take_one_down(); |
| | pass_it_around(); |
| http://www.silkroad.com/ | } |
| | back_to_work(); /*never reached */ |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Tim Bass | #include<campfire.h> |
| Principal Network Systems Engineer | for(beer=100;beer>1;beer++){ |
| The Silk Road Group, Ltd. | take_one_down(); |
| | pass_it_around(); |
| http://www.silkroad.com/ | } |
| | back_to_work(); /*never reached */ |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the NANOG
mailing list