PRDB Retirement next Monday, May 8

Thu May 4 14:47:04 UTC 1995

There is no NSFNET AUP any longer, but, if you are NACRing nets to speak to
AS 690, it makes sense to use the ANS AUP and the ansnet NACR.

Steve R./Merit
==
>From list-admin at merit.edu Wed May  3 17:38:23 1995
Received: from merit.edu (merit.edu [35.1.1.42]) by home.merit.edu (8.6.12/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id RAA09146; Wed, 3 May 1995 17:38:18 -0400
Received: from interlock.ans.net (interlock.ans.net [147.225.1.3]) by merit.edu (8.6.10/merit-2.0) with SMTP id RAA02650 for <nanog at merit.edu>; Wed, 3 May 1995 17:04:51 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA58255
  (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for nanog at merit.edu);
  Wed, 3 May 1995 17:04:42 -0400
Message-Id: <199505032104.AA58255 at interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2);
  Wed, 3 May 1995 17:04:42 -0400
From: Steve Heimlich <heimlich at ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1);
  Wed, 3 May 1995 17:04:42 -0400
Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 17:04:40 -0400
To: smd at icp.net
Cc: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Re: PRDB Retirement next Monday, May 8
Status: R

Sean,

>The one question I have about NACRs until 8 May is what
>text to put at the top of them.
>
>Obviously the old NSFNET wording is no longer appropriate.
>
>	Sean.

My feeling on this is that ANS doesn't look at it, so you can
replace it with XXXXXX if you like, or not if you don't, but I will
let Merit have the last word on this.

Steve