Has PSI been assigned network 1?
Steven J. Richardson
sjr at merit.edu
Mon May 1 16:25:12 UTC 1995
[ ANS has had both NSFNET and non-NSFNET customers on ENSSs. There are
still lots of non-NSFNET customers which ANS has on ENSSs in addition to
the CNSSs. ]
> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 1995 21:20:25 CDT
> From: sob at academ.com (Stan Barber)
> To: Tony Li <tli at cisco.com>
> CC: avg at sprint.net, karl at mcs.com, nanog at merit.edu, rps at isi.edu, salo at msc
> Okey. I am just looking for clarification. Vadim's statement seemed to eith
> indicate that ANS was not a "large service provider" or that NSSes were no
> longer part of ANS's backbone.
> I am certainly in no position to know how to classify "large service provid
> unless we look at the NSF NSP definition as a metric. If there is another
> objective definition, I'd be happy to hear about it.
> As for the NSSes no longer being in the ANS backbone, it is clear that ANS
> is using some Cisco products, but it is also clear there are still some CNS
> that Cisco didn't build.
> Stan | Academ Consulting Services |internet: sob at academ.com
> Olan | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: bcm!academ!sob
> Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only min
More information about the NANOG