Internic address allocation policy

• Previous message (by thread): Internic address allocation policy
• Next message (by thread): Internic address allocation policy
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>Looks like a double standard to me...  The same argument could be placed
>for any subnet not on an 8,16, or 24 bit bound.

Yes and no.  Technical limitations in things like in-addr name service make
moving things with any boundary in the last byte very difficult, but things
with any boundary before it possible (and a boundary on a byte much easier).

-george

• Previous message (by thread): Internic address allocation policy
• Next message (by thread): Internic address allocation policy
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]