Has PSI been assigned network 1?

Curtis Villamizar curtis at ans.net
Wed Apr 19 21:58:47 UTC 1995

In message <Pine.BSD.3.91.950419000916.9764A-100000 at muffin.wis.com>, "Michael F
. Nittmann" writes:
> Maybe we should make participation at a meet point subject to filing data 
> to the route server, and peering should only go via route servers.

I'd settle for must register routes, although the latter would enforce
the requirement.  It seems to me to be very politically infeasible, so
not really worth further discussion.

> flames?

Be carefull.  Bill might hug you.  :-)  Not really a flame, but what
you said was not really off the wall either, so none required.  :-)

> Mike


More information about the NANOG mailing list