Has PSI been assigned network 1?
Michael F. Nittmann
nittmann at wis.com
Wed Apr 19 20:41:57 UTC 1995
my opinion: the nacr style is good, because it requires really getting
the thing right and thought out.
Anyways, such a db should be used infrequently. aggregation should make
frequent entries unnecessary. (...)
ripe's telnet is good too, but a real telnet online type access would
invite sloppyness, and/or repalce route flap by nultiple daily policy
flap.
Mike
On
Wed, 19 Apr 1995, Vadim Antonov wrote:
> jgs at aads.net (John G. Scudder) wrote:
>
> >What AS690 does is not just bureaucratic silliness. It's also enlightened
> >self-interest (as Curtis keeps saying). If enough people have the sense to
> >want to protect themselves, the Routing Registry will fly.
>
> I agree with the idea of Routing Registry (although i'm more than sceptical
> about RADB in its present form, replacing distributed computation with
> a cental box not controlled by the service providers).
>
> However, my point is that it should be easy to use and should be on-line;
> the NACR-style configuration nightmare is not going to fly.
>
> --vadim
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael F. Nittmann nittmann at wis.com
Network Architect nittmann at b3.com
B3 Corporation, Marshfield, WI (CIX Member) (715) 387 1700 xt. 158
US Cyber (SM), Washington DC (715) 573 2448
(715) 831 7922
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the NANOG
mailing list