Has PSI been assigned network 1?

Michael F. Nittmann nittmann at wis.com
Wed Apr 19 20:41:57 UTC 1995

my opinion: the nacr style is good, because it requires really getting 
the thing right and thought out.

Anyways, such a db should be used infrequently. aggregation should make 
frequent entries unnecessary. (...)

ripe's telnet is good too, but a real telnet online type access would 
invite sloppyness, and/or repalce route flap by nultiple daily policy 


Wed, 19 Apr 1995, Vadim Antonov wrote:

> jgs at aads.net (John G. Scudder) wrote:
> >What AS690 does is not just bureaucratic silliness.  It's also enlightened
> >self-interest (as Curtis keeps saying).  If enough people have the sense to
> >want to protect themselves, the Routing Registry will fly.
> I agree with the idea of Routing Registry (although i'm more than sceptical
> about RADB in its present form, replacing distributed computation with
> a cental box not controlled by the service providers).
> However, my point is that it should be easy to use and should be on-line;
> the NACR-style configuration nightmare is not going to fly.
> --vadim

Michael F. Nittmann                                             nittmann at wis.com
Network Architect						nittmann at b3.com 
B3 Corporation, Marshfield, WI (CIX Member)               (715) 387 1700 xt. 158
US Cyber (SM), Washington DC				  (715) 573 2448
							  (715) 831 7922

More information about the NANOG mailing list