Has PSI been assigned network 1?
Karl Denninger, MCSNet
karl at mcs.com
Fri Apr 28 14:19:53 UTC 1995
> The equipment available today is designed foolishly --
> route update processing and actual packet processing should NEVER be done by
> the same CPU -- but it is -- and as such you're dead when this happens.
> Lest anyone believe this, it's bullshit.
> Karl just buys low end gear and then complains because it's not high
> end gear.
I suppose that a 7000 with a SSP is considered "low end" gear then?
It was *Vadim* who was complaining about CPU usage on your boxes, not me.
Karl Denninger (karl at MCS.Net)| MCSNet - The Finest Internet Connectivity
Modem: [+1 312 248-0900] | (shell, PPP, SLIP, leased) in Chicagoland
Voice: [+1 312 248-8649] | 7 POPs online through Chicago, all 28.8
Fax: [+1 312 248-9865] | Email to "info at mcs.net" for more information
ISDN: Surf at Smokin' Speed | WWW: http://www.mcs.net, gopher: gopher.mcs.net
More information about the NANOG