cook at Mcs.Net
Wed Sep 7 14:55:09 UTC 1994
Would you clarify this please Steve. I thought peering had a $ price tag
attached to it. But NSF surely can't say that MCI must peer with COOKnet
because MCI might say they want $2000 a month to do so and I might say I
can nott afford such an "outrageous" price. Are you saying that MCI or
XYZ must peer with everyone where peer is defined as accepting traffic
for R&E destinations at no cost?
To say that peering MUST take place and then leaving the cost of such
peering to be negotiated seems of dubious workability.Gordon Cook, Editor
COOK Report on Internet -> NREN 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA
NEW E-mail: cook at mcs.com
Subscriptions: $500 corporate site license; $175 edu.,non-profit & small corp.
On Wed, 7 Sep 1994, Stephen Wolff wrote:
> > So long as ALL NSPs agree to peer at MAE-East then things should be OK, as no
> > transit is needed because all the regionals are connected by their individual
> > service provider. However there is no REQUIREMENT to peer. I am looking for
> > NSF to make this a requirement (at least for a year or so) to ensure continued
> > ubiquitous connectivity.
> It **IS** a requirement of NSF - if you connect to any NAP, but not if
> you connect to MAE-East, the CIX, the GIX, the SWAB or the Dundalk
> Consolidated International Three Hundred Baud Interconnect (local reference).
> The NSF-sponsored NAPs are the only places where we have the right to
> shape policy.
More information about the NANOG